Friday, January 22, 2010

Ocs Security Clearance

bulkhead project: "Because the variant has not been approved?"

La provincia 21 gennaio 2010

Interpellanza in Comune. «Perché la variante non è mai stata approvata?»

L'opposizione non intende allentare la morsa sul sindaco Stefano Bruni e sulla sua
amministrazione. L'obbiettivo continua a essere quello di inchiodarli alle loro eventuali responsabilità per avere permesso la realizzazione del muro del lungolago. Il sindaco ha 30 giorni di tempo per rispondere a un'interpellanza, presentata a nome di tutti i gruppi di minoranza, che va dritta al nocciolo della questione: il muro è frutto di una variante che non è mai stata approvata dal responsabile unico del procedimento (Rup), Antonio Ferro. Per quale motivo? Dal centrosinistra si parla di «un fatto gravissimo che dovrebbe interessare la Corte dei conti». Il muro, come è ormai noto, secondo il progetto approvato doveva avere dimensioni e altezze diverse. In poche parole, doveva essere più piccolo garantendo una maggiore visibilità del lago. The interpellation, filed the other day, says in the introduction that "the 2009 version antiesondazione the wall resulted in an increase in the height of the wall, making a substantial change to the project" and that under Law 554 of 1999, Article 134 paragraph 9,? appraisals are approved by the head of one variant of the procedure?. By the Mayor, former Councillor Fulvio Caradonna Works great and the same project manager of the bulkheads, Antonio Viola, arrived a few explanations but have absolutely satisfied that the opposition to call back, this time in black and white, for Iron has not complied with the requirement laid down by law "as the variant in question can not certainly be attributed to the type removed from the approval of Rup deduced from under the contract code that reads: "I have not considered variations within the meaning of paragraph 1 of the actions initiated by the project manager to resolve questions of detail." Well, that part of the wall made of non-conformity with the approved project, not a detail.
contrary. Councillor List for Como, Roberta Marzorati, anticipated in the classroom content of interpellation, saying that the lack of approval by the Rup 'is a very serious thing, one thing to state audit, which could have a dramatic effect. If a variant is not approved we can not even do its payments on the same variant that can not be remedied. " If Brown does not respond within 30 days become the subject of the interpellation debate in city council. It could be the occasion for yet another clash between opposition and majority on the wall of the lake. Dario
Alemanno

0 comments:

Post a Comment